According to Bloomberg News, the United Arab Emirates has caught North Korean red-handed in supplying Iran with munitions and supplies for potential nuclear weapons.
Diplomats are saying the UAE seized a ship two weeks ago that was transporting explosives, detonators, grenades, and munitions bound for Iran. The ship, owned by an Australian subsidiary of a French company, was found to have ten containers on board disguised as oil equipment.
Despite this incident being a clear violation of United Nations sanctions, the UN has yet to receive a response from either Iran or North Korea.
Earlier this summer, the Security Council voted to adopt a resolution punishing North Korea for its recent nuclear-bomb test and missile launches. This newest resolution requires the inspection of any material in international
waters that is suspected of carrying arms.
Read More:
Rueters: Australia probes N. Korea weapons for Iran seizure
WSJ: Iran arms remain sealed
Asia Times: Storm over North Korea-Iran arms vessel
Across the world, Muslims have begun celebrating the holy month of Ramadan, a month of fasting and feasting. But threats of swine flu and the economic downturn, on top of already existing security fears in several Islamic countries, have dampened the mood.
In response to the H1N1 swine flu virus, a string of governments have placed restrictions on citizens making the pilgrimage to the holy places in Saudi Arabia, a trek traditionally made by many Muslims during Ramadan.
Meanwhile, financial worries forced many families to cut back on their holiday spending. In the Saudi cities of Mecca and Medina, which normally do a brisk trade from pilgrims during Ramadan, businesses are bracing for their worst holy month in years.
Trying to tempt travelers, tour companies have slashed the price for package tours from Riyadh to Mecca by 25 percent, the English language Saudi Gazette reported.
In neighbouring Medina, officials said they expected business to be down by 70 percent.
Read More:
Xinhua: “Gazans find joyous Ramadan a luxury during economic downturn”
Rueters: “Somali president calls for Ramadan ceasefire”
AFP: “Swine flu, economic downturn overshadow Ramadan”
In the last 50 years, numerous presidents have called on Israel to stop its expansion activities. Israel has consequently ignored this request. To date, the Obama administration has been significantly more vocal that its predecessors about this demand.
This change has not gone unnoticed by Israel’s Arab neighbors. But the Tehran Times took another look at the issue of Israeli settlements Tuesday, criticizing the role of individual Americans and organizations funding this activity.
The Times reports:
This support is currently undermining the United States efforts to restart the peace negotiations. In addition to its diplomatic efforts to stop the settlements, the Obama administration must also stop the flow of American financial support for the settlement activities.
The American individuals and organizations that support the settlement activities must ask themselves: is what they are doing good for their fellow Americans? The Obama administration has correctly recognized that continuation of the Arab-Israeli conflict is harmful to the U.S. interests in the Middle East and indirectly contributes to terrorism.
Those Americans who support the settlement activities under current circumstances are indirectly contributing to the promotion of terrorism against the United States and should think about the consequences of their behavior for the safety and security of their country.
Categories: Arab-Americans, Iran, Israel and Palestine Tags: Americans, expansion, Hamas, Iran, Israel, Jews, Obama, settlements, Tehran Times
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton renewed her calls for Iran to release all US citizens it is detaining immediately in a statement Saturday.
In this statement Clinton pointed to five cases: the three American hikers who crossed into Iran from Iraq in late July; a US-Iranian scholar; and a private detective and former FBI agent who went missing in Iran in 2007.
She said, Washington “is deeply concerned about the welfare of our American citizens who have been detained or are missing in Iran.” continuing with, “We once again urge Iran’s leadership to quickly resolve all outstanding American citizen cases.” Read more…
Iranian authorities are beginning a mass trial of more than 100 members of the “green” opposition who were found protesting the results of the recent presidential election. This trial comes just days before Mahmoud Ahmadinejad will be sworn in for his second term as president.
The protesters are facing trail for “conspiring with foreign powers to stage a revolution through terrorism,” The New York Times reports. The former Iranian President Mohammad Khatami has voiced his criticism of the trials, calling them “show” trials, and saying he hoped they would not “lead to ignorance of the real crimes.”
The opposition leader, Mir Mousavi, will not be tried in these proceedings and has urged his followers to resume their chants of “God is Great” to protest the trials.
A number of the charges are the result of a confession by reformist cleric and blogger Muhammad Ali Abtahi. In an emotional videotaped confession Abtahi said the elections weren’t fraudulent and that the three opposition leaders “promised to always back each other up.” Some are now touting this statement as proof of the opposition’s malign intent. But human-rights leaders say this confession was most likely forced out of Abtahi.
The protests may have slowed down, but Iran and it’s government hierarchy are still in turmoil. This Sunday, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad fired two members of his cabinet. Many are seeing this act as another indicator that conservatives within Iran are at odds over how best to handle the protests following the controversial and contested election.
According to Iranian law, any president who fires 11 members of his cabinet must face a vote of confidence before the Iranian parliament. The two firings, according to CNN.com, would put Ahmadinejad past this threshold.
However, it is unclear whether both men will remain dismissed, or if one will return to avoid the vote of
confidence. The Iranian state media is claiming that only one person was really let go.
Back in the U.S., Secretary of State Hillary Clinton held firmly to the White House’s position on Iran’s protests saying that the country’s future “is really for the people to decide.”
Read CNN.com’s: Ahmadinejad may face vote of confidence in parliament
Nassim Nazemi
The news from Iran has died down, but some Americans, like Chicago’s Nassim Nazemi, have not stopped their fight. Click the play button to hear what she has to say.
Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.
Highlights:
- “We expected that no matter who won the election, it would be business as usual”
- “Suddenly we’re using social media, things like Twitter and Facebook to actively resist oppression and to help people actively resist government oppression.”
- “It got harder and harder to get the world’s attention as the protests waned, as time went by, as Michael Jackson died and took over the news cycle.”
- “I know one thing with certainty and that is, Iran will never be the same.”
Don’t want to listen? Here’s the transcript:
Earlier this week, I had the opportunity to speak with Nassim Nazemi, an Iranian-American, to talk about what she has been doing to help foster democracy in Iran and help her friends and family that are still there.
First Question Nassim… have you always followed Iranian politics so closely?
I would say myself and most of my friends and family who’ve become involved in one way or another never really viewed themselves as politically active in any way. Most of us, at least speaking for myself, didn’t expect much to come out of the election. We viewed it with the same skepticism that we’ve developed over the last 30 years in regards to this Islamic republic. We expected that no matter who won the election, it would be business as usual.
Read more…
Yesterday on ABC’s “This Week,” Vice President Joe Biden signaled that the Obama administration would not stop an Israeli attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities. But was this statement just another Biden gaffe?
When asked whether Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was right in indicating that Israel would take matters into its own hands if Iran did not show willingness to finally negotiate over its controversial nuclear program by the end of the year, Biden replied, “We cannot dictate to another sovereign nation what they can and cannot do when they make a determination, if they make a determination, that they’re existentially threatened.”
On the surface Biden’s remarks suggest a toughening US stance against Iran’s nuclear ambitions, but White House officials denied that, the Los Angeles Times is reporting. According to the Times, White House officials are saying “his televised remarks Sunday simply reflected the US view that Israel had a right to defend itself and make its own decisions on national security.
And in Jerusalem, the Israeli government had no comment on Biden’s remarks.
However, in Tehran, the chatter was not recieved in silence. Al Jazeera reports Alaeddin Broujerdi, the head of Iran’s parliamentary committee on national security and foreign policy, said Tehran was ready to take “real and decisive” action if Israel attacked its nuclear facilities.